Serving Aurora, Denver Metro & Colorado | 15+ Years of Personal Injury and Criminal Defense Experience
A DUI involving THC is complex when compared to a driving under the influence of alcohol case. Simultaneously, it is substantially easier to get convicted of such a charge. Consulting with a Colorado DUI attorney is always advisable if facing these cases.
A typical criminal defense client will focus on the impact of a conviction. A DV conviction can result in jail time, fines, and probation. However, an allegation alone can cause serious impacts to a criminal defendant.
Most criminal cases will come with protection orders. These are orders that are imposed in any criminal case. A domestic violence case will come with an order that includes very specific provisions.
Personal injuries can be life-altering events. They often bring about physical pain, emotional distress, and financial hardship.
In such circumstances, understanding your legal rights is crucial. This is where an Aurora personal injury attorney comes into play.
The Lawrence Law Firm specialize in representing individuals that have suffered injuries due to the negligence of others. We navigate the complexities of personal injury law to seek justice for their clients.
Colorado Criminal defense can seem simple in some regards, but it can get complicated very quickly. A common term that most Americans know is self-defense. It is an easy enough concept to understand, but the legalities and procedure are specific.
Driving under the influence means driving a car while impaired by drugs or alcohol. Authorities typically charge this type of criminal offense as a misdemeanor. In 2017, Colorado changed the law to allow someone with three prior offenses to be charged with a felony.
A Felony DUI is a class 4 felony. Punishable by up to 6 years in the department of corrections or state prison. A fine of $2,000 to $500,000 could also be imposed.
On Friday June 21, 2024, the United States Supreme Court published an opinion. The opinion focused on a person’s ability to have firearms. Specifically, it dealt with individuals who are subject to restraining orders.
Gun rights are a controversial topic, but they are a basic right for all American citizens. The opinion does not have any limiting principles. Questions such as can the government restrict people of their First Amendment rights in the similar fashion are still open.
